Was the Shooting of Charlie Kirk a False Flag Operation? • OP News

Recently, long time popular political commentator and social media personality Candace Owens dropped a viral video questioning the legitimacy of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk’s assassination, revealing several lies being told my mainstream media networks, alongside government officials about his alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson.

While I was definitely not a fan of Kirk or care about his death, I do take interest in government entities launching false flag operations in our nation to propagate political clashes such as culture/race wars and increase discontentment across the nation.

This often results in policies being passed which further restrict the rights and freedoms of average citizens or further empowers the surveillance state.

Let’s start with information regarding the suspect:

Tyler Robinson Has Never Confessed: Tyler has never confessed to these crimes (or not yet at least) and authorities have confirmed this, including Utah governor Spencer Cox. In fact, it is reported that he is actually bewildered by the idea of committing such an act.

Robinson Is Not a Gun Enthusiast: While Tyler does own a hunting rifle, he has stated that he only owned it as an heirloom, passed down from a family member. While his family does appear to be very conservative and some sources have claimed that they were fans of Donald Trump, including Charlie Kirk, this does not apply to Tyler.

Robinson Says He Did Not Author the Reported Text Messages: The FBI and mainstream media have shared screenshots of text messages claimed to have belonged to Tyler’s phone, however he claims that he never wrote any of them. In fact, in the reported messages he refers to his car as a “vehicle”, yet video evidence from a traffic stop in 2022 shows that he clearly refers to his car as a.. car, like most normal people.

Robinson’s Family Does Not Believe He Is Guilty: Contrary to claims by the media, it appears as if Tyler’s family does not actually support his guilt and his father also never turned him in. In fact, the family “friend” reported by the media is a private detective with close relations to law enforcement. The detective’s name is Mike Mitchell. He apparently called the family and asked for Tyler to turn himself in to avoid a much more aggressive and possibly deadly altercation with SWAT who would eventually make a home arrest.

Robinson Has Never Visited Utah Valley University: Apparently, Tyler has never stepped foot on to Utah State University, the campus where Kirk was shot and killed. He was supposedly nearby the campus on that day which could explain the reported possible photo of him at Dairy Queen. He was however accepted to Utah State University, which is in a completely different city.

Tyler Robinson Is Not Suicidal: Considering Tyler was concerned about his safety regarding police swarming his home and possibly shooting him, it is pretty strong evidence that the man is not suicidal, contrary to Washington County Sheriff Nate Brooksby’s claim that he was having “suicidal ideations”. Shortly after mentioning this, he admits that Tyler was “fearful of being shot by law enforcement”.

It surely can’t be both.

Was he suicidal or afraid of dying?

Why did Brooksby seem so intent on explaining how he got on the phone with Mitchell, Tyler’s supposed investigator friend? Nobody asked him this, it’s a very odd thing to emphasize unless you are trying to convince someone.

Another question, why is law enforcement so firm in covering up the identity of this “friend” who is or was a public servant? They surely didn’t have a problem releasing the identities of anyone else involved in Robinson’s life.

Robinson Is Extremely Intelligent: According to his school records, Tyler had a perfect GPA. Why would someone so smart write a full confession of murdering someone in cold blood?

The Reported Photo of the Shooter Doesn’t Look Like Robinson: The viral photo of the shooter responsible for Kirk’s death doesn’t quite match up with Tyler’s description. First of all, the man in the photo looks noticeably taller. Second, why didn’t the feds provide video of the shooter? It’s obviously taken from a surveillance camera. Was it so that they could purposely blur the photo?

Robinson’s Family Believes That His Apartment Was Staged: According to Owens, Tyler’s family went to his apartment after his arrest and felt as though it was staged. They also harbor suspicions on why Tyler’s boyfriend Lance Twiggs was immediately cleared of any wrongdoing.

Suspicions were also raised over things such as a furry bed being intentionally placed in their sons room, which was something Twiggs took interest in, not Tyler.

Lance’s family confirmed this with Owens.

Interesting enough, the New York Post reported on September 23rd that Twiggs has vanished.

Now that we’ve discussed reliable information regarding the supposed shooter, let’s dive into the very questionable narrative.

The Official Narrative Makes No Sense

While authorities swiftly arrested an alleged shooter—the official narrative is riddled with inconsistencies, contradictions, and outright absurdities that suggest a deeper conspiracy at play.

A Patsy or the Real Shooter?

The government’s version of events strains credulity:

Destroyed Crime Scene: Kirk’s security team hastily dismantled the scene, removing cameras and banners that could have provided critical evidence.

No Visual Evidence: Federal investigators claim Robinson abandoned a Mauser rifle in a wooded area after leaping from a rooftop. According to the FBI, the rifle was recovered with its barrel fully reinstalled. But video footage from the scene paints a contradictory picture: the suspect is seen fleeing the rooftop empty-handed.

Impossible Logistics: Weapons specialists note that a Mauser rifle cannot be disassembled and reassembled in mere seconds while running, much less with the precision required for accuracy. Yet the FBI insists Robinson somehow did exactly that — leaving the rifle in the woods fully assembled and ready for inspection — while simultaneously changing clothes mid-operation.

No Recovered Bullet: Despite claims of a sniper shot, no bullet has been recovered, making forensic verification impossible. Ballistics matching, often touted as definitive proof, is itself a Hollywood myth—bullets cannot be conclusively linked to a specific firearm.

False Flag Hallmarks

The suspicious circumstances surrounding Kirk’s assassination bear the hallmarks of a false flag operation:

Government Deception: The FBI and other agencies have a documented history of staging or enabling attacks to justify crackdowns on civil liberties (e.g., Oklahoma City, 9/11).

Decoys and Misdirection: Reports indicate multiple “decoy” individuals were present, suggesting a coordinated effort to mislead investigators.

Private Jet Anomalies: A private jet linked to the event mysteriously disappeared from public tracking systems, raising questions about elite involvement.

Security Failures: Despite heightened tensions, Kirk’s security detail failed to detect or neutralize the threat, reminiscent of the Secret Service’s inexplicable lapses during the Trump assassination attempt.

Who Benefits?

While Israel—a nation infamous for its assassination programs—remains a prime suspect due to Kirk’s criticism of Israeli policies, other possibilities loom:

The CIA or Deep State: Kirk’s vocal opposition to globalist agendas made him a target. His assassination could serve as a warning to dissenters.

Domestic Left-Wing Extremists: Radicalized individuals, many brain-damaged by COVID vaccines (which impair cognitive function), have celebrated Kirk’s death, signaling a dangerous escalation in political violence.

Fabricated Crisis: The event could be engineered to justify martial law, digital ID mandates, or further censorship under the guise of “preventing extremism.”

The Bigger Picture: A Controlled Collapse

This assassination fits a pattern of orchestrated chaos designed to destabilize America:

Media Manipulation: Corporate press outlets parrot government narratives while suppressing alternative investigations.

Erosion of Trust: Each suspicious event deepens public skepticism, accelerating societal breakdown.

AI and Automation: As human jobs vanish, unrest grows—perfect conditions for authoritarian “solutions.”

More Questions

Why Did Sheriff Brooksby Lie About Mike Mitchell?

Despite being a former member of law enforcement and a private investigator, there is not many traces of evidence or information on Tyler Robinson’s supposed friend. I could only find a LinkedIn profile and two photos related to a Mike Mitchell involved with law enforcement.

One was shared on the Toledo Police Department’s Facebook page.

The other was shared on the Facebook page of Washington County Sheriff’s Office.

Based on current information circulating, I’m guessing that the first photo is a different guy.

How is it that such a prominent figure in this investigation and previous police officer of over two decades has such little photographic or video presence?

More importantly, based on this post, it’s clear that Sheriff Brooksby lied about the retirement date of Mitchell, which Brooksby claimed was three years ago, not in January of 2024.

Who Were the Two Men Behind Him Giving Hand Signals?

There were also two men behind Kirk giving hand signals just before the gunshot. Many believe these guys were some sort of federal agents, possibly CIA.

Is Israel Responsible?

According to The Grayzone, a Trump insider and longtime friend of Kirk told them that the assassinated conservative leader’s turning point on Israeli influence provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu’s allies that left him angry and afraid.

Owens also slightly alludes to this information in her video.

The source said anxiety spread within the Trump administration after an apparent Israeli spying operation was uncovered.

Charlie rejected an offer earlier this year from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into his Turning Point USA (TPUSA) organization, America’s largest conservative youth association, according to a longtime friend of the slain commentator speaking on the condition of anonymity. This source also mentioned that the late pro-Trump influencer believed Netanyahu was trying to cow him into silence as he began to publicly question Israel’s overwhelming influence in Washington and demanded more space to criticize it.

In the weeks leading up to his September 10th assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb.

According to Kirk’s friend, who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel’s behalf. “Charlie was the only person who did that,” they said, recalling how Trump “barked at him” in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk’s mind that the president of the United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power, and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts.

By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders.”

“He was afraid of them,” the source emphasized.

I’d like to clarify that there is currently no evidence of an Israeli government role in Kirk’s assassination. However, that has not stopped thousands of social media users from speculating that the pro-Trump operative’s shifting views on the issue contributed in some way to his death. By the time of publication, over 100,000 Twitter/X users have liked a September 11th post by libertarian influencer Ian Carroll declaring about Kirk, “He was their friend. He basically dedicated his life to them. And they murdered him in front of his family. Israel just shot themselves.”

Yesterday was a turning point for Israel US relations.

Les than 24 hours and the internet already figured out who the most likely culprit was.

He was their friend. He basically dedicated his life to them. And they murdered him in front of his family.

Israel just shot…
— Ian Carroll (@IanCarrollShow) September 11, 2025

Many advancing the unsubstantiated theory have pointed to a Twitter/X post by Harrison Smith, a personality at the pro-Trump Infowars network, stating on August 13 – almost a month before Kirk’s assassination – that he was told by “someone close to Charlie Kirk that Kirk thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against Israel.”

The frenzied speculation has set off shockwaves in Tel Aviv, where Netanyahu was compelled to explicitly deny that his government killed Kirk during a September 11th interview with NewsMax.

Demand the Truth

In my opinion, the Charlie Kirk assassination reeks of deception. Whether Tyler is a patsy or part of a larger scheme, one thing is clear: the official story doesn’t add up.

Americans must reject complacency, demand transparency, and prepare for the possibility that this was not just a lone gunman—but a staged event in the globalists’ war on freedom.

Stay vigilant. Question everything. The truth is out there—but those in power don’t want you to find it.