The latest Project Veritas bombshell exposes Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey as a lying traitor who, contrary to what he told Congress under oath, is actively censoring conservatives on his tyrannical platform.
A Twitter insider recorded Dorsey admitting recently that while the company is currently “focused on one account,” referring to President Donald Trump’s, “this is going to be much bigger than just one account, and it’s going to go on for much longer than just this day, this week, and the next few weeks, and go on beyond the inauguration.”
“So, the focus is certainly on this account [@realDonaldTrump] and how it ties to real world violence. But also, we need to think much longer term around how these dynamics play out over time. I don’t believe this is going away any time soon.”
Dorsey added during the exchange that the country is “extremely divided,” and that this is apparent “every single day” on the Twitter platform.
Back in the fall, Dorsey testified under oath before the Senate Commerce Committee that his platform does not censor content.
“Anyone can tweet these articles,” Dorsey said about the “Huntergate” bombshells from the New York Post that exposed Joe Biden’s son as a criminal pervert who colluded with communist China and capitalized on his father’s influence as the former vice president.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) quickly challenged this lie, noting that he was unable to share the story to his Twitter account even after Dorsey made these false statements.
Twitter needs to be shut down for treason against the United States
Since Dorsey was under oath at the time, it is now confirmed that he committed perjury, which is a serious crime. Will he ever be held accountable?
“18 USC 1621 makes it a felony to lie under oath to the Senate,” Cruz later tweeted, urging the public and his colleagues to pursue justice in the matter.
Nothing has been done thus far, of course, and Twitter has only continued its censorship spree, both in targeting of President Donald Trump and his supporters and in doing the bidding of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by propagating lies about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
According to Twitter, communist China is in no way responsible for unleashing the China virus, which can only be “cured” through mask wearing and mass vaccination.
Other content that Twitter employees disagree with is routinely banned using the excuse that it violates the platform’s “terms of service,” even when similar content from a different political perspective is allowed to be posted and shared.
The promotion of Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa terrorism, for instance, has never once been pulled from Twitter, despite President Trump’s account being permanently “suspended” for supposedly “promoting violence.”
Selective enforcement of the “rules” is censorship, plain and simple, and this is what Twitter does all the time to elevate leftist viewpoints while suppressing conservative ones.
The Federalist‘s Ben Domenech noted in a piece he wrote that Twitter failed to take action against user posts that overtly threatened Meghan McCain, his wife, with violence.
“Their questions amounted to: why wasn’t this obvious violation of your stated rules removed faster?” Domenech explained about two members of Congress who were aware of this breach of conduct and wanted to know why Twitter had done nothing to address it.
“Why did it require publicity to get attention from your offices? What do you intend to do to prevent this in the future?”
The answer, of course, is nothing. Twitter plans to do nothing to enforce its own arbitrary rules whenever leftists violate them, and everything and the kitchen sink when conservatives supposedly do.
A coordinated conspiracy among the media and Big Tech to shut down the story and protect the Biden crime family
So Zuckerberg and Dorsey are committing criminal fraud to rig the elections. They are maliciously blocking the NY Post article by falsely claiming the URL might contain “malicious code” or something unsafe. This is exactly the tactic that Google used against Natural News several years ago; fabricating false claims of malicious code and then using it to censor content they wanted to suppress.
Meanwhile, the left-wing media is blacklisting the entire story, hoping people won’t find out about it since Big Tech is also blocking the story. Twitter even censored White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany today to try to shut down any knowledge of the story. Think about that: A radical left-wing tech company that caters to communist China is now blocking the White House and getting away with it!
We are now living in a communist China-style country, or the former Soviet Union where only “official lies” are allowed to be accessed or shared. Any information that makes Democrats look bad is instantly blocked and smeared, and any person who attempts to tell the truth about the crimes of Democrats is banned or de-platformed.
As House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy is now saying, this is flatly unacceptable in America!
Senators Cruz and Hawley have chimed in, accusing Big Tech of interfering in the election. And it’s clear that Big Tech’s attempt to cover up this story has now become the bigger story, causing even more publicity about the Joe Biden crime family activities that the techno-tyrants are trying to cover up in the first place.
Jack Dorsey and his executive team must be raided and arrested for their crimes against children
Twitter suspended journalist Andy Ngo for tweeting inconvenient facts about the purported “epidemic” of transgender deaths, and undercover journalism organization Project Veritas from running recruitment ads. But if you’re a pedophile who wants to discuss your attraction to minors — Twitter’s just fine with that.
Big League Politics discovered a little-noticed, quietly enacted Twitter rule change from March, which says “Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way.”
So, if you post politically inconvenient yet accurate statistical facts, as Ngo did, you get suspended. But if you discuss “attraction towards minors,” Twitter explicitly allows it.
It goes without saying that Twitter’s policy did not arise out of some blanket commitment to free speech. Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has specifically rejected such commitments, rubbishing the idea that Twitter is the “free speech wing of the free-speech party,” as one VP at the company described it in 2012.
In an interview with Wired last year, Dorsey said that the “free speech wing” comment was a “joke” that was taken too seriously.
“This quote around ‘free speech wing of the free-speech party’ was never, was never a mission of the company. It was never a descriptor of the company that we gave ourselves,” said Dorsey.
The Twitter CEO continued, saying that a commitment to free speech “comes with the realization that freedom of expression may adversely impact other people’s fundamental human rights, such as privacy, such as physical security.”
In other words, Twitter’s decision to allow pedophiles on its platform is something they’ve chosen to do, not something they have to do.
In the worldview of twitter, a journalist posting statistics that contradict the intersectional left is somehow a threat to human rights, privacy, or physical security. But allowing pedophiles to openly organize isn’t.
The Inescapable Link Between Homosexuality and Pedophilia
A German cardinal, Cardinal Walter Brandmüller, is in a lot of trouble for pointing out the obvious: the problem in today’s Catholic Church is homosexuality and its inescapable link to pedophilia.
The sexual abuse of boys by Catholic clergy is now a mushroom cloud hanging over the Catholic Church, threatening its stability and its future. The issue burst into the open with the revelation in the summer of 2018 that six dioceses in Pennsylvania had been covering up at least 1,000 instances of child sexual abuse by hundreds of priests over the course of decades.
A study commissioned by the German Bishops Conference and published last year “found that more than 3,600 children were sexually abused by Catholic clergy in Germany between 1946 and 2014.”
Cardinal Brandmüller was a bit too quick to deflect blame from the Catholic Church itself, by blaming the whole problem on homosexuality. But they invited this scandal when it began allowing homosexuals to enter its seminaries in the 1960s. They did so because of the difficulty of recruiting young men into the priesthood who quite naturally wanted to marry and have families.
As more and more homosexuals flooded seminaries and then went into the priesthood, a culture of homosexuality was fostered in the church with all its attendant pathologies.
One pathology that LGBT activists will not acknowledge is the unmistakable connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. The American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children stated flatly that “the vast majority of the offenders are male.” (The information in these paragraphs is found in the publication, “The Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality” from the Family Research Council.)
The Journal of Sex & Married Therapy, in a study of male sex offenders against children, found that one-third of the offenders directed their sexual activity against males. And the Journal of Sex Research found that homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of sex offenses against children.
This fact is particularly disturbing. Homosexuals comprise just two percent of the population, yet are responsible for 33% of all child sexual abuse. They offend against children at 16 times the rate of the normal population.
The Archives of Sexual Behavior, in a study of 229 convicted child molesters, found that “eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.”
Thus it comes as no surprise to discover that research into the priesthood scandal in the Catholic Church reveals that 81% of the victims of clergy abuse are young boys.
Now, this is most certainly not to say that every priest or even most priests are pedophiles. The great majority, of course, is not. But some, in fact too many, are and that’s the problem.
Fortunately, the Catholic Church for the first time seems to be taking firm steps to deal with this, by making men with same-sex proclivities ineligible for the priesthood. If they had established this standard in 1960, thousands upon thousands of children would have been spared the life-altering trauma of sexual abuse.
The Catholic Church is also taking the first tentative steps to allow married priests. An unmarried priesthood is a practice that dates only from the 14th century and does not go back to the beginning of the Catholic Church. There’s nothing biblical or apostolic about it. They must make this move soon because this scandal could take the Catholic Church down.
If the Catholic Church needs inspiration for the change, they need only look at the man they consider the first Pope, the Apostle Peter. He was a married man, who had a mother-in-law whom Jesus healed from a fever and a wife with whom he traveled in his apostolic journeys.
Bottom line: if the first “pope” could be married, every priest after him should have the same privilege. The Catholic Church will be stronger, priests will be happier, and children will be much safer. AFA
The correlation between Homosexuality and Pedophilia
“Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against male children is approximately 2:1.
David Finkelhor: A sourcebook of Child Sexual Abuse. The data on pages 20-21 and 65 shows that the number of boys abused is 45% of the number of girls. This aggregates data from 19 studies. But the true percentage may be higher due to male pride hindering reporting according to the book – See https://www.childmolestationprevention.org/cmrpi-prevention-plan
Of 4007 pedophiles studied by Abel and Harlow, 3952 were male and only 55 were female. See Abel GG, Harlow N. The Abel and Harlow Child molestation prevention study. Excerpted from The Stop Child Molestation Book. Philadelphia, Pa: Xlibris; 2001.
In another study of admitted child molesters by Abel and Harlow, there were 5218 males and 103 females – The Stop Child Molestation Book. Philadelphia, Pa: Xlibris; 2001. So basically pedophiles are 98% male and 2% female.
The Family Research Council has a very thorough analysis of the research (http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=is02e3)
Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.
Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).
The 10 percent fallacy: Studies indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population.
Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.
The evidence indicates that homosexual men molest boys at rates grossly disproportionate to the rates at which heterosexual men molest girls. To demonstrate this it is necessary to connect several statistics related to the problem of child sex abuse: 1) men are almost always the perpetrator; 2) up to one-third or more of child sex abuse cases are committed against boys; 3) less than three percent of the population are homosexuals. Thus, a tiny percentage of the population (homosexual men), commit one-third or more of the cases of child sexual molestation.” http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=is02e3
A new study quoted in the independent newspaper found that homosexuals and heterosexuals are quite different psychologically. “The new study analyzed the behavior of 33,000 American adults, and found 3% of men and 2.7% of women were not heterosexual.” http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/hetrosexual-and-homosexual-people-categorically-different-and-not-on-a-sexuality-continuum-study-a6741961.html
Homosexual men are 15x more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexual men
We now do the maths on the following data.
1. 33.3% of the victims of pedophilia are boys and 66.7% are girls.
2. 3% of the male population are homosexual and 97% are heterosexual.
3. 98% of pedophiles are male and 2% are female.
Since 98% of the perpetrators are male, at least 31.3% of all pedophilia is male on male. So 3% of men (homosexuals) carry out 31.3% of the child abuse and 97% of men (heterosexuals) carry out 66.7% of the child abuse and women carry out 2% of it.
So the chances of a homosexual male being an abuser are 31.3/3 times more than average, whereas the chances of a heterosexual male being an abuser are 66.7/97 times the average (i.e. less than the average).