Remember When Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Wrote a Book Promoting the Legalization of Pedophilia?

Remember When Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Wrote a Book Promoting the Legalization of Pedophilia?

Listen to this article

Just 45 days before the 2020 election, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the first Jewish female justice of the Supreme Court, died from “complications of metastatic pancreas cancer,” triggering a wave of weeping and gnashing of teeth among leftists who worshiped her for supposedly being a “champion of justice.” But what about justice for the tens of millions of unborn human lives that were terminated in the womb, thanks to Ginsburg’s aggressive support for abortion?

The pro-death, pro-LGBTQ justice is a long-beloved icon of the far-left who, according to Shannon Bream, “died peacefully” while surrounded by her friends and family. The same, however, cannot be said of the untold millions of innocent babies who under Ginsburg’s rule were violently ripped from their mothers’ wombs and destroyed in the name of “women’s rights.”

Despite supposedly being “passionate about Judaism’s concern for justice” and “shaped in the crucible of its minority status,” Ginsburg was a strong proponent of baby murder, believing unborn human lives to hold no value.

Among many other pro-death positions, Ginsburg voted to strike down a law that would have banned partial-birth abortions in Nebraska, for instance. She also voted to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act back in 2013, after which she became the first Supreme Court justice to officiate a homosexual “wedding” ceremony.

Murdering babies, even when they are fully developed and about to be born, is always a “woman’s right,” according to Ginsburg. She infamously declared that any laws or regulations that have “the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of nonviable fetus’ violate the Constitution,” period.

These and other far-left positions represent the bedrock of today’s Democrat Party, by the way, which is why many speculated that leftists would become even more unhinged in response to Ginsburg’s death.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was Also a Strong Proponent of Pedophilia and Child Rape

Ginsburg was a well-known strong proponent of abortion, having stated back in 2009 that Roe v. Wade, which legalized it throughout America, was necessary to address “population growth,” and “particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

Recognizing that abortion, at least in the United States, has long been about exterminating “human weeds,” also known as black people – this according to Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger – we can only conclude that Ginsburg was anti-black.

However, another little-known fact about Ginsburg is that she fully supported pedophilia and child sex abuse, having written in a book she co-authored entitled, Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that the age of consent for sexual activity should be reduced to 12.

Since the age of consent in the United States which varies from state to state is from 16 to 18, lowering the age of consent to 12 would legalize pedophilia of children age 12 and above.

The book led to sweeping changes made by the federal government in the name of sex equality.

WASHINGTON, DC – AUGUST 30: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, celebrating her 20th anniversary on the bench, is photographed in the West conference room at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Friday, August 30, 2013.
Nikki Kahn/The Washington Post via Getty Images

In 1977 when Ginsburg was General Counsel of the ACLU, she co-authored (with Brenda Feigen-Fasteau) Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977, for which Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010.

The 230-page Sex Bias in the U.S. Code identifies hundreds of federal laws alleged to discriminate against women and recommends an avalanche of government and social changes, including:

  • Military draft and combat duty for women.
  • Legalization of prostitution (see pages 97, 99, 215-216 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code)
  • Sex integration of prisons, reformatories, schools and colleges and their activities (including sports), all-girls and all-boys organizations, and fraternities and sororities.
  • Changing the names of the Boy Scouts, Girls Scouts and Big Brothers of America to reflect sex integration (see pages 145, 205 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code).
  • Elimination of the traditional family concept of husband as breadwinner and wife as homemaker.
  • Comprehensive government child-care.
  • Adoption of sex-neutral language, e.g., “artificial” instead of “manmade”; “person, human” instead of “man, woman”; and plural nouns “they” and “them” instead of “singular third person pronouns”. At the same time, however, Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau hypocritically insist that the U.S. Department of Labor retains its “Women’s Bureau”.

You can read the document below.

On page 102 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, under the sub-heading “Recommendations,” Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau recommend a revision of 18 U.S.C. §2032 from “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” to “A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and . . . the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old“.

Below is the pertinent paragraph:18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” and substitute a Federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense patterned after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person’s power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.

Ginsburg (and her co-author) also recommended that the Mann Act be repealed. The Mann Act is a federal law passed in 1910 which makes it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose”.

From Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, pp. 98-99:

The Mann Act . . . poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates . . . . It was meant to protect from ‘the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ ‘those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . .’

In other words, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg had her way, sexual abuse of children 12-years or older would not be a crime, nor would child sex trafficking.

A 18 page document full of Testimony against Ruth Bader Ginsburg dated July 23rd,1993 came out weeks before her final confirmation for Supreme Court Justice. Among many of her beliefs and views, the one she shared on the age of consent was documented to have been apart of the testimony.

You can read the full 18 page document below.

Even so, both the left and the right – at least the establishment right – has nothing but positive things to say about the woman, who supposedly was led by her Jewish faith to hold the positions she promoted right from the bench all these years.

“Our nation has lost a jurist of historic stature,” declared Chief Justice John Roberts in a statement. “We at the Supreme Court have lost a cherished colleague. Today, we mourn, but with confidence that future generations will remember Ruth Bader Ginsburg as we knew her – a tireless and resolute champion of justice.”

Diaper-in-chief Joe Biden also issued a statement – or at least his campaign did – suggesting that Ginsburg was some kind of “American hero” who “stood for all of us” – all of us except for unborn babies and other young children, of course.

“She was an American hero, a giant of legal doctrine, and a relentless voice in the pursuit of that highest American ideal: Equal Justice Under Law,” Biden supposedly stated further.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x